Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 KAN 82 - Flentie v. Townsend

Flentie v. Townsend’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
May 1980
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 1980

20 state decisions

60193419401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James v. Grigsby · Pettigrew v. Lewis & Willard · Sly v. Powell · Stout v. Bowers · McMillen v. Foncannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the demurrer to plaintiff's evidence could not be sustained a verdict against her could not be directed, because of conflicting evidence subsequently produced in behalf of the defendants. Her case might have been strengthened by the testimony offered in their behalf, but on the motion to direct a verdict the prima facie case made by her testimony could not be weakened or destroyed by theirs." (p. 36.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.