Watson v. Feibel’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, II (1978), Southport Mill, Ltd. v. Ansley (1925)
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. · Murray v. Barnhart · Johnson v. Levy · Southern Sawmill Co. v. Ducote · Copley v. Flint & Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"If, at 1he time of the sale of Immovables, it has been stipulated Unit, for want of payment of the price within the term agreed on, the sale should bo of right dissolved, the buyer may nevertheless make payment after the expiration of the term, as long as ho has not been placed in a state of default, bv a judicial demand, but after that demand, the judge can grant him no delay.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The resolution of the sale is allowed ‘only after the vendor has exhausted every remedy for obtaining payment’ [the court quoting from the French commentator, ToullierJ. Can a vendor, to whom payment in principal, interest, and costs is tendered, and who refuses to accept, be said to have exhausted every remedy for obtaining payment?””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Atkins v. Garrett““Plainly, the distinction is this: That where the resolutory condition has boon expressly stipulated and takes place of right, the purchaser has until judicial demand in which to pay; but where it is only implied and takes place only as the result of a final judgment, he has until final judgment in which, to pay.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. Atkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.