139 Md. 697
117 A 925
Decided January 10, 1922
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1922-01-10
<p>Divorce — A dultery.</p> <p>That a woman, accepted marked attention from a man other than her husband, in spite of the latter’s objection, will not sustain a charge of adultery.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-01-10
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2001
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶2 The decree of the lower court, dismissing the original bill, which was filed by the wife, and granting the relief prayed by the husband’s cross-bill, was affirmed as to the original bill, while the cross-bill was dismissed, each side to pay its own costs.