Nelson v. Berkner’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 1993
1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Newman v. Smith · Rheingans v. Smith · 52 Tex. Civ. App. 278 - Mutual Reserve Lies Insurance v. Seidel · Stearns v. Kennedy · Braddy v. . Elliott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Promissory statements may be made in terms which imply that a certain condition of things exists at the time, and form the basis of the future things. When they are of this description, if they are intentionally false, they are fraudulent, and form the basis of a right of rescission.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The jury could find that there was a fraudulent promise predicated upon misrepresentations concerning the productiveness and cultivated acreage of the farm.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.