Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

139 Misc. 177

Pankau v. Cosor

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1931

New York Supreme Court · decided 1931-01-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1934

1 state decisions

Relies on Kelley v. Kelley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Foster, J.

¶1Motion to vacate several judgments entered herein and to direct that one judgment be entered with one bill of costs. It appears these several causes of action were consolidated by an order of this court, and that no reservation as to costs was made in said order. The plaintiff has entered several judgments, and has taxed costs in each judgment, with the exception that only one trial fee and single witness fees have been taxed. Several authorities have been submitted which apparently are in conflict, at least to some extent. I adopt the rule laid down in Kelley v. Kelley (123 Misc. 583), which holds in effect that, where actions are consolidated they cease to exist, and in place thereof only one action is pending. It logically follows, therefore, that, unless a reservation as to costs in the several actions is made in the order of consolidation, such costs cannot thereafter be taxed.

¶2Motion granted, without costs.

/139/misc/177 · .json · Public domain