Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 N.C. 588 - State v. Horton.

State v. Horton.’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
9
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2019

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

50190519101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. shooteth at the poultry of B. and by accident killeth a man; if his intention was to steal the poultry, *Page 514 which must be collected from circumstances, it will be murder by reason of that felonious intent; but if it was done wantonly and without that intention, it will be barely manslaughter. The rule I have laid down supposeth that the act from which death ensued was malum in se . For if it was barely malum prohibitum , as shooting at game by a person not qualified by statute law to keep or use a gun for that purpose, the case of a person so offending will fall under the same rule as that of a qualified man. For the statutes prohibiting the destruction of the game under certain penalties will not, in a question of this kind, enhance the accident beyond its intrinsic moment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “naturally evil as adjudged by the sense of a civilized community,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.