139 N.C. App. 222 - Brewer v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

65 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) state[ ] a clear and specific reconvening time in the order; and (2) the time interval between the two hearings [is not] reasonably brief.”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sood v. Sood · Wellons v. White

2. “A permanent custody order establishes a party’s present right to custody of a child and that party’s right to retain custody indefinitely. . . . In contrast, temporary custody orders establish a party’s right to custody of a child pending the resolution of a claim for permanent custody—that is, pending the issuance of a permanent custody order.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re N.T.S. · 248 N.C. App. 429 - Tankala v. Pithavadian

3. “). The temporary order here was set for review after approximately four months, a time period more similar to that in Dunlap and File . We conclude that the four-month interval here was reasonably brief and that, as a result, the 7 July 2010 order was a temporary child custody order which is interlocutory and does not affect any substantial right. Accordingly, Respondent-mother's interlocutory appeal is dismissed. Dismissed. Judges STEELMAN and GEER concur. NOTES [1] Initials have been used throughout to protect the identity of the juvenile. [2] Chapter 50, entitled”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sood v. Sood · 248 N.C. App. 429 - Tankala v. Pithavadian