Patch v. Arsenault’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 16 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Martin v. Applied Cellular Technology, Inc. (2002), Tessier v. Rockefeller (2011)
6 federal appellate · 16 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jay Edwards, Inc. v. Baker · Maxwell Ice Co. v. Brackett, Shaw & Lunt Co. · Gilmore v. Bradgate Associates, Inc. · Renovest Co. v. Hodges Development Corp. · Welch v. Gonic Realty Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The tort of intentional misrepresentation, or fraud, must be proved by showing that the representation was made with knowledge of its falsity or with conscious indifference to its truth and with the intention of causing another person to rely on the representation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dolan v. SunGard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.