Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 NH 708 - Marquay v. Eno

Marquay v. Eno’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

141
cited by 141 later decisions
16
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 48 district · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 141 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop (1999), McCloskey v. Mueller (2006)

13 federal appellate · 48 district · 76 state decisions — followed in 16 states

4901995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bush v. Lucas · Corum v. University of North Carolina · Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. Specialized Transportation Services, Inc. · 22 Cal. 3d 508 - Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City School District · 42 Wash. 2d 316 - McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] child while in school is deprived of the protection of his parents or guardian. Therefore, the actor who takes custody ... of a child is properly required to give him the protection which the custody or the manner in which it is taken has deprived him.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f no common law duty exists, the plaintiff cannot maintain a negligence action, even though the defendant has violated a statutory duty”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the actor has brought into contact or association with the [victim] a person whom the actor knows or should know to be peculiarly likely to commit intentional misconduct....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.