Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 N.J. Super. 366 - As v. BS

139 N.J. Super. 366 - As v. BS’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Miller v. Miller (1984), Mhb v. Htb (1985)

2 district · 38 state decisions

2401976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First National Bank v. Dickinson · Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape May · 126 N.J. Super. 394 - Ross v. Ross · 25 N.J. Misc. 180 - Schneider v. Schneider · Mott v. Iossa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The child] is the real party in interest in this proceeding. To permit defendant to repudiate his intent to support the child and no longer stand in loco parentis to him would cause irreparable harm to the boy. He would be without familial roots, without a known heritage. Equitable estoppel must be applied in this instance to prevent that result. [ 97 N.J. at 164 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he essential principle of the policy of estoppel here involved is that one may, by voluntary conduct, be precluded from taking a course of action that would work injustice and wrong to one who with good reason and good faith has relied upon such conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that for the first 12 years of his life this child was brought up as the son of the parties hereto ... [who both] accepted ... responsibility ... [for him and] prevented [him] from being raised by any other individuals through their action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.