Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 N.J. Super. 439 - Carroll v. Cobb

139 N.J. Super. 439 - Carroll v. Cobb’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2017

7 state decisions

4019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · Worden v. Mercer County Board of Elections · Perri v. Kisselbach · In re the Alleged Lunacy of Lindsley · 120 N.J. Super. 583 - Edelstein v. Ferrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subject to any provisions of law and the Constitution of New Jersey and the United States, no patient shall be deprived of any civil right solely by reason of his receiving treatment under the provisions of this Title nor shall such treatment modify or vary any legal or civil right of any such patient including but not limited to the right to register and to vote at elections....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “as those terms are used in the Constitution and the statute, and thus disenfranchised. Indeed we suspect that those imprecise terms may be troublesome to experts in the fields of psychiatry or psychology. [ Id. at 448 , 354 A. 2d 355 ]. We reasoned”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “foreclose the county board of elections, on an individual basis and for specifically stated reasons, from reviewing and challenging the voting qualifications of any member of the class, so long as it is done in the manner provided by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.