State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
6
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Namet v. United States · Santillanes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an accomplice's testimonial statement [is] inadmissible under the Confrontation Clause unless the accomplice [is] unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the accomplice concerning the statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zamarripa“at any time have an opportunity to cross-examine [the accomplice] on his statement”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zamarripa“full opportunity to cross-examine [the witness] at his prior trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Aaron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.