139 Ohio App. 3d 263 - In Re Sadiku’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · In re Hayes · State ex rel. Heller v. Miller · State v. Finnerty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he proper scope of rebuttal testimony lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. Thus, a trial court's decision regarding the scope of rebuttal testimony will not be reversed unless the trial court's decision was unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.