139 Ohio App. 3d 490 - State v. Glander’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Parson · State v. Moore · 3 Ohio App. 3d 17 - State v. Tomblin · 104 Ohio App. 3d 448 - State v. Daws · 87 Ohio App. 3d 290 - State v. Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Without compliance with Crim.R. 16, the defense is handicapped in trial preparation, particularly in such critical areas as deciding whether a defendant should waive jury trial and whether he should take the stand in his defense. The consequence of the prosecution's failure to permit a defendant to inspect his statement is that if the defendant does not know or remember what is contained in the statement, he cannot knowingly and intelligently decide whether to take the witness stand and thus place his credibility at issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under these circumstances, we are satisfied that disclosure of the identifying statement in the summary the state provided would have benefited appellant in preparing his defense and could have affected his decision to take the stand”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.