139 Ohio App. 3d 664 - Burris v. Lerner’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2025
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. · Murphy v. City of Reynoldsburg · Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc. · Mootispaw v. Eckstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has been applied in * * * medical contexts to establish that the witness's routine practice was adhered to in the situation before the court as to which the witness has no particular recollection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]vidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the habit or routine practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“routine practices undertaken by one in the context of medical or *Page 9 business situations are precisely the sorts of scenarios for which the foregoing rule of evidence was intended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.