Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 Okla. 115 - Take v. Miller

Take v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1954
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Privett v. United States · Parker v. Riley · Grisso v. Milsey · Kimbro v. Harper · Gage v. Harlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the absence of a removal of restrictions by the Secretary of the Interior, the widow and other children of the allottee had no moro intei'est which they could convey in the homestead portion of his allotment after Ms death than they had before Ms death, so long as Rosetta survived. Before his death they had no interest which was subject to barter, and neither had they afterwards, until Hie death of Rosetta, unless the restrictions imposed had been removed by the Secretary of the Interior; and it is not contended that this had been done.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.