139 Or. App. 579 - State v. Sumerlin’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Defendant need not have driven in an intoxicated state to have committed the offense of reckless driving; conversely, he need not have been speeding to have committed the offense of DUII. The offenses were not merely `incidental' to one another."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the same conduct or criminal episode violates two or more statutory provisions and each provision requires proof of an element that the others do not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“By speeding while driving drunk, defendant showed a willingness to commit both reckless driving and DUII.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.