Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 P.3d 342 - State v. Fowler

State v. Fowler’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2021

1 district · 5 state decisions

30200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Elkins v. United States · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Lustig v. United States · United Steelworkers of America v. Weber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The principles of the doctrine (although no longer explicitly called the silver platter doctrine) still are applied in federal court, such as when evidence is obtained out of the country, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which does not govern foreign officials’ conduct. See, e.g., Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968) (evidence obtained in the Philippines in violation of the Fourth Amendment by foreign agents was admissible in federal court when the federal officers did not undertake or unlawfully participate in the unconstitutional search and seizure).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he test for whether a recording of a conversation or communication is lawful is determined under the laws of the place of the recording.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Mnterceptions and recordings occur where made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.