People v. Chavez’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2022
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jones · Losavio v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist. · Collier v. Legakes · State v. Tippecanoe County Court · People v. DISTRICT COURT, IN & FOR SECOND JUD. DIST.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The potential for unfairness that results when an attorney in the district attorney's office has had an attorney-client relationship with the defendant is equally present when an employee of the district attorney's office has gained confidential information about the defendant 's cases through his employment with an attorney who consulted with the defendant . In either case, there is a distinct possibility that confidential information could be used to the advantage of the government.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has been and can continue to be adequately screened”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“finds special circumstances that would render it unlikely that the defendant would receive a fair trial,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Perez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.