¶1Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).
139 S. Ct. 1401
In re Leffebre
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 25, 2019
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2019-03-25
Cited by 72 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Rehaif v. United States (2019), Jorja Trading, Inc.; Automatic Auto Finance, Inc.; Cashfish Motor Pawn, Inc.; Virginia Rivers; Monte Johnston; And John Does 1–10 v. Leah Willis and Adrian Bartholomew (2020)
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Relies on Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2019-03-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →