Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 SO3D 1113 - Crawford v. Crawford

Crawford v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Villaume v. Villaume · Baseline Manufacturing Corp. of Florida v. Edwards · LaBove v. Theriot · 582 So. 2d 191 - Baton Rouge Bank & Trust Co. v. Coleman · 693 So. 2d 1229 - Stoffer v. Stoffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On motion of the court or any party, a final judgment may be amended at any time to alter the phraseology of the judgment, but not its substance, or to correct errors of calculation. The judgment may be amended only after a hearing with notice to all parties, except that a hearing is not required if all parties consent or if the court or the party submitting the amended judgment certifies that it was provided to all parties at least five days before the amendment and that no opposition has been received.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.