Pryer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “This cause comes before this [c]ourt on [Pryer's] pro se [m]otion to [s]how [c]ause. [Pryer] requests this [c]ourt to order the Itawamba County Circuit Clerk to forward [Pryer] a free copy of the documents not contained within the [c]ircuit [c]lerk's file. This motion contains the exact same requests as the previously filed motions. In addition, the [m]otion to [s]how [c]ause contains completely unfounded and slanderous allegations against several court offices. The [m]otion to [s]how [c]ause has no legal merit and shall be DENIED.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 247 So. 3d 1245 - Timothy Gene Pryer v. Thomas Gardner, III

2. “the Order givin[g] Carol Gates the Office of Judge de facto or pro tempore and the order givin[g] Carol Gates authority to appoint indigent counsel for December 2, 2004 [hearing] and the names of the 40 plus souls and their addresses according to the record.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 247 So. 3d 1245 - Timothy Gene Pryer v. Thomas Gardner, III

3. “the record provides no indication that the circuit court treated Pryer's Motion to Show Cause as a petition for post-conviction relief.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 247 So. 3d 1245 - Timothy Gene Pryer v. Thomas Gardner, III