Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

139 So. 3d 989

In re Ranshi

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 13, 2014

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2014-05-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2016

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-05-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2| Considering the Motion to Revoke Conditional Admission filed jointly by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s conditional admission to the practice of law in the State of Louisiana be revoked, effective immediately. Respondent may not reapply for admission until he can demonstrate at least a one-year period of sobriety and compliance with the terms and conditions of a contract with the Lawyers Assistance Program. In the event respondent chooses to submit an application for readmission, it shall be filed with the Disciplinary Board, which shall appoint a hearing committee to take evidence and report to this court whether respondent should be readmitted to the bar and allowed to practice law in Louisiana. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall participate in the hearing and provide such information, evidence, and recommendations to the hearing committee as may be appropriate.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs associated with these proceedings.

¶5FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Bernette J. JohnsonJustice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
/139/so3d/989 · .json · Public domain