Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 S.W.3d 921 - Prater v. Castle

Prater v. Castle’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burns v. Level · LaFleur v. Shoney's, Inc. · Fratzke v. Murphy · National Fire Insurance Co. v. Spain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a party, such as [in] Fratzke and LaFleur , fails to timely answer or to timely supplement answers to interrogatories concerning a claim for unliquidat-ed damages, and that party also fails to seek leave of the court during trial to file an untimely answer or an untimely supplemental answer to those interrogatories, a trial court is precluded from instructing the jury on an award for any claim of unliquidated damages in excess of the last amount stated in the answers to the interrogatories. However, if a party moves the trial court at any time during trial for leave to file belated answers or supplemental answers to the interrogatories concerning his claim for unliquidated damages, the trial court retains the discretion to permit or to deny such a request.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) past, present and future pain and suffering; (b) lost wages; (c) medical expenses; (d) future medical expenses; and (e) permanent impairment of your power to earn money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.