Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 U.S. 616 - Wilson v. Everett

Wilson v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis

139 U.S. 616 · 1891

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 1951
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1951 · most notably Dimick v. Schiedt (1935), Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. (1933)

52 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2001891190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amory v. Amory

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All tlie Instructions complained of in these assignments of error, except the second, involve only the matter of the surplus over $22r>,000: and, as it clearly appears that that portion of the plaintiffs’ claim was disallowed, there could have been no prejudice to the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.