Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 Vt. 456 - State v. Gardner

State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
4
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably State v. Catsam (1987), State v. Patnaude (1981)

81 state decisions

58019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. New York · 89 Wash. 2d 217 - State v. Ruzicka · State v. Wayne Kelley · State v. O'BRIEN · McGovern v. Hays

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person shall not be incompetent as a witness in any court, matter or proceeding by reason of his conviction of a crime other than perjury, subornation of perjury, or endeavoring to incite or procure another to commit the crime of perjury. The conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude within fifteen years shall be the only crime admissible in evidence given to affect the credibility of a witness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(a) General rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted but only if the crime involved moral turpitude. Admissibility shall depend upon a determination by the court that the probative value of this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.