Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 80 Wis. 2d 122 - State v. Mendoza (1977), Oborn v. State (1910)
1 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beard v. United States · Chicago Public Stock Exchange v. McClaughry · Buel v. State · Newton v. State · F. Dohmen Co. v. Niagara Fire Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have no such thing under the code as a motion in arrest of judgment, in the technical sense with the common-law procedure and limitations appertaining thereto. We have the motion in arrest of judgment, so called, for the purpose of challenging the right to1 hold the accused notwithstanding the conviction upon grounds common tO' the ancient motion and also merely staying the execution of the judgment to admit of a convicted person having some remedy or taking some proceeding to save his rights in any proper way. But the whole matter is referable to the code and the rules of court and the unwritten law based thereon.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Slowe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.