139 Wis. 2d 291 - State v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2000
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 74 Wis. 2d 705 - State v. Courtney · 118 Wis. 2d 339 - State v. Wickstrom · 112 Wis. 2d 166 - State v. Popanz · 114 Wis. 2d 454 - State v. Bleck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Any parent, or any person acting pursuant to directions from the parent, who does any of the following is guilty of a Class E felony: (a) Intentionally conceals a minor child from the child’s other parent; (b) After being served with process in an action affecting the family but prior to the issuance of a temporary or final order determining custody rights to a minor child, takes or entices the child outside of this state for the purposes of depriving the other parent of physical custody as defined in s. 822.02(9); or (c) After issuance of a temporary or final order specifying joint custody rights, takes or entices a child under the age of 14 from the other parent in violation of the custody order. (2) No person violates sub. (1) if the action: (a) Is taken to protect the child from imminent physical harm; (b) Is taken by a parent fleeing from imminent physical harm; (c) Is consented to by the other parent; or (d) Is otherwise authorized by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.