Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 Wis. 2d 353 - State v. Harvey

139 Wis. 2d 353 - State v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably State v. Bollig (2000), State v. Weed (2003)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

2601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Liotta v. National Forge Co. · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 136 Wis. 2d 333 - State v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction or death sentence has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. . . . Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court's determinations of what the attorney did, or did not do, and the basis for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.