Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 WVA 818 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1983

8 state decisions

301954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sheppard · 138 W. Va. 376 - State v. Gargiliana · 139 W. Va. 535 - State v. Moubray · Grubb v. Burford · Hanriot v. Sherwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “from Allen and paid sixty cents therefor. Scott was not present at any time during the second visit of Jacobs and no employee of the club, other than Allen, was present at the time Jacobs purchased the drink. On January 14, 1953, about three forty five o'clock a.m., Jacobs made a third visit to the club, at which time he also purchased a drink of whiskey from Allen, paying sixty cents therefor. Scott was not present during the third visit of Jacobs. On January 16, 1953, about one fifty five a.m., Jacobs made a fourth visit to the club, purchased and drank a bottle of beer, and heard Scott”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Four full pts. of Glenmore and one broken seal Pt. of whiskey and one full fifth and one broken fifth of Burnett's and one broken fifth of Old Hickory whiskey, broken 5th of Glenmore and a broken 5th of Scotch and utility bills & cards addressed to Same Scott”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is the general rule, subject to exceptions, that on trial of a person indicted for a specific offense evidence showing commission of distinct and unconnected criminal acts other than that charged is inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.