Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 ALAAPP 75 - Spinks v. State

Spinks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1992

12 state decisions

40191619201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Southern Railway Co. v. Williams · Sanders v. State · Talbert v. State · McKinney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule is that offers of compromise or to make restitution for property the subject of a crime by the accused is [sic] not admissible either for or against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.