Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 App. D.C. 255 - In re Barratt's Appeal

14 App. D.C. 255 - In re Barratt's Appeal’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1967
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1967

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

4018991900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tilghman v. Proctor · Legal Tender Cases Knox v. Lee Parker · Mitchell v. Tilghman · Hepburn v. Griswold · In re Barratt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the rules that govern the finality and conclusiveness of adjudications at the common law do not apply, in the strict sense, to administrative or quasi-judicial action in the Executive Departments of Government, yet in administrative action, as well as in judicial proceeding, it is both expedient and necessary that there should be an end of controversy. * * * ****** “In what we have said we do not desire it to be understood that the Patent Office may not, if it thinks proper so to do, entertain and adjudicate a second application for a patent after the first application has been rejected. What we decide is, that it is not incumbent upon the office as a duty to entertain such applications * * *.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.