Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 ARIZ 119 - Diamond v. Jacquith

Diamond v. Jacquith’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
7
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Chevalier v. Lane's, Inc. (1948), Waugh v. Lennard (1949)

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 32 state decisions

9019121920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seymour v. Oelrichs · Glass v. Hulbert · Lowman v. Sheets · Curtis v. Sage · MacDonald v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is firmly established in this state that the full and complete performance of a contract by one of the contracting parties takes the contract out of the statute of frauds, and that the party so performing his contract may sue upon it in a court of law, and that he is not compelled to abandon the contract and sue in equity or upon a quantum meruit, as seems to be the law in some of the states.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.