Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 ARK 538 - Cossart v. State

Cossart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1854

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2011

10 state decisions

3018541860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “effectually check the machinery of the court in its operation, and frustrate the wholesome administration of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a contumacious witness, juror, party litigant, or counsel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.