14 Cal. 3d 524 - In Re Kreamer’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
136 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 139 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably 15 Cal. 3d 878 - Segretti v. State Bar (1976), 41 Cal. 3d 493 - In Re Severo (1986)
136 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 562 - In Re Higbie · 11 Cal. 3d 436 - Yokozeki v. State Bar · Bradpiece v. State Bar · 8 Cal. 3d 842 - In Re Fahey · 3 Cal. 3d 381 - Demain v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`suffered the ignominy of a criminal conviction [and] has served time in a [federal] penal institution. . . .'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“which at once afford some explanation of [petitioner's] conduct, allow further assessment of his character in the light of his post-conviction behavior and all in all have a significant mitigating effect on the charges now before us.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he purpose of a disciplinary proceeding is not punitive but to inquire into the fitness of the attorney to continue in that capacity to the end that the public, the courts and the legal profession itself will be protected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Preston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.