Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Cal. 3d 711 - In Re Shapiro

14 Cal. 3d 711 - In Re Shapiro’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
7
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably 45 Cal. 4th 1063 - People v. Villa (2009), 26 Cal. 3d 623 - In Re Caudillo (1980)

4 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

1101975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4082

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[h]e does not suggest any manner in which he can successfully challenge the fact of his post-parole conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and the fact that such conviction constituted a violation of a condition of parole. He presents nothing which even suggests that all factual issues to be presented at the summary prerevocation hearing to which he was entitled would not necessarily have been resolved against him.... He thus fails completely to demonstrate prejudice [citation], and we can declare without reservation that the denial in this case was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “manifest that ... petitioner cannot establish that he was prejudiced by the denial of ... a timely prerevocation hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “acts as a limited type of `custody' to which habeas corpus may be directed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.