14 Cal. 3d 802 - In Re Haygood’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably 8 Cal. 4th 728 - People v. Romero (1994), Haygood v. Younger (1985)
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 11 Cal. 3d 542 - In Re Kapperman · 64 Cal. 2d 412 - In Re Sandel · In Re Shull · 34 Cal. App. 3d 8 - People v. Hartsell · 27 Cal. 2d 637 - In Re Cowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“term at 6 years with a January 8, 1975, expiration date. Petitioner was again released on parole, but on April 27, 1973, his parole was suspended, again causing his terms to be refixed at maximum. On December 13, 1973, parole was formally revoked. His terms have not been refixed at less than maximum since that date. Although petitioner had served the period from January 8, 1969, to April 27, 1973, on his”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haygood v. Younger“term. The Authority suspended petitioner's parole on January 7, 1972. By operation of Adult Authority policies then in effect, that suspension automatically caused any incompleted terms to be refixed at maximum. On March 14, 1972, in conjunction with the formal revocation of parole, the Authority again fixed the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haygood v. Younger“terms, petitioner escaped from a prison camp and shortly thereafter participated in a robbery. He was prosecuted first for the robbery and on January 5, 1959, was convicted and sentenced to a term of not less than one year for violation of section 211. This”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haygood v. Younger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.