14 Cal. 3d 943 - People v. Longwill’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
143 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler (1978), 17 Cal. 3d 236 - People v. Olivas (1976)
143 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Robinson · Gustafson v. Florida · Badillo v. Superior Court · 7 Cal. 3d 186 - People v. Superior Court · 13 Cal. 3d 528 - People v. Brisendine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only where they provide no less individual protection than is guaranteed by California law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Our decisions do not permit a distinction to be made between: (1) transportation to a magistrate as in Simon; (2) transportation to a magistrate for the offense of evading arrest as in Norman ; and (3) transportation to the stationhouse for ultimate disposition by release and/or citation prior to incarceration as is the case with a significant percentage of public inebriates. In all these situations the same factors are operative: the potential harm to the officer if the arrestee is armed justifies a limited weapons search, but a full booking search is `inappropriate in the context of an arrestee who will never be subjected to that process.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“`[I]n the area of fundamental civil liberties which includes ... all protections of the California Declaration of Rights we sit as a court of last resort, subject only to the qualification that our interpretations may not restrict the guarantees accorded the national citizenry under the federal charter. In such constitutional adjudication, our first referent is California law and the full panoply of rights Californians have come to expect as their due....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.