Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 CALAPP2D 105 - Scott v. Flanagan

Scott v. Flanagan’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 1974
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1974

14 state decisions

6019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Royer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a well-established rule that the granting of a new trial rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, and will not be disturbed if it can be upheld upon any ground shown by the record. (Smith v. Royer, 181 Cal. 165, 166 [ 183 P. 660 ].) Where the motion is based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence it must appear that the evidence is new, material, and not cumulative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.