In re Stein’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murray v. Superior Court · 134 Cal. App. 5 - McCutcheon v. Superior Court · 12 Cal. App. 335 - First National Bank v. Superior Court · 15 Cal. App. 45 - Bibby v. Dieter · Ellis v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . Where a complaint fails by its allegations to show that the conditions required by law have been complied with an order for the appointment of a receiver is void for all purposes. The following eases so hold: McCutcheon v. Superior Court, 134 Cal.App. 5 [ 24 P.2d 911 ]; Ellis v. Superior Court, 138 Cal.App. 552 [ 33 P.2d 60 ]; Bibby v. Dieter, 15 Cal.App. 45 [ 113 P. 874 ] (holding that such appointment may be attacked collaterally); A. G. Col Co. v. Superior Court, 196 Cal. 604, 606 [ 238 P. 926 ]; First Nat. Bank v. Superior Court, 12 Cal.App. 335 [ 107 P. 322 ],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.