14 Cal. App. 4th 687 - People v. McGuire’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 24 Cal. 4th 1122 - Ketchum v. Moses (2001), 110 Cal. App. 4th 1122 - Weinberg v. Feisel (2003)
1 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 23 Cal. 3d 545 - People v. Perez · 48 Cal. 3d 321 - People v. Harrison · 24 Cal. 3d 514 - People v. Tanner · 25 Cal. 2d 422 - People v. Gilbert · 6 Cal. 3d 78 - In Re Cortez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Legislature `is deemed to be aware of statutes and judicial decisions already in existence, and to have enacted ... a statute in light thereof.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“' "Whether a course of criminal conduct is divisible and therefore gives rise to more than one act within the meaning of section 654 depends on the intent and objective of the actor. If all of the offenses were incident to one objective, the defendant may be punished for any one of such offenses but not for more than one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Carter“We must `view the evidence in a light most favorable to the respondent and presume in support of the order the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence. [Citation.]' ( People v. Holly (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 797, 803 , 133 Cal.Rptr. 331 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.