Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 CALAPP4TH 984 - People v. Harris

People v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 7 Cal. 4th 988 - People v. Kirkpatrick (1994), 8 Cal. 4th 965 - People v. Masterson (1994)

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

140199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Medina v. California · 1 Cal. 4th 324 - People v. Price · 2 Cal. 3d 205 - People v. Robles · 2 Cal. 3d 894 - People v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Diligent advocacy does not require an attorney to blindly follow every desire of his client. An attorney can ordinarily make binding waivers of many of his client's rights as to matters of trial tactics [citation]. When the attorney doubts the present sanity of his client, he may assume his client cannot act in his own best interests and may act even contrary to the express desires of his client [citation]. To do otherwise may cause prejudicial error [citation].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`protection of society in general is not a consideration for the section 1368 inquiry. The law seeks only to protect the accused.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.