Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 CONNAPP 205 - In re Steven G.

In re Steven G.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2002

9 state decisions

40198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Kent v. United States · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · State v. Jacobowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]uveniles are constitutionally entitled to notice, sufficiently in advance of any hearing, of the specific issues that they must meet. They are also entitled to notification of their right to counsel, the right to cross-examine any witnesses against them, and to be informed regarding their privilege against self-incrimination. In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1966).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.