Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Conn. App. 808

Carr v. Mehta

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 21, 1988

Connecticut Appellate Court · decided 1988-04-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1988

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1This appeal is an attempt by the defendant to have this court retry the facts found by the trial court. We will not. The defendant also claims that the trial court’s orders are impermissibly vague. We do not agree. Furthermore, any claimed ambiguity could have been clarified for the defendant by the seeking of articulation from the trial court.

¶2There is no error.

/14/connapp/808 · .json · Public domain