Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 E.H. Smith 399

54 N.E 780

Gulick v. . Griswold

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1899

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1899-10-17

The case agreed discloses the following facts : The plaintiff’s testator, Isaac F. Jones, died in December, 1870, seized of the premises known as Do. 331 West Twenty-second street, in the city of Dew York, and leaving him surviving his widow, a daughter (the plaintiff), and two children of a deceased son. Both the widow and the daughter were of full age, and the grandchildren, who were then minors, are now of full age.

Relies on Barber v. . Cary

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1899-10-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1939

5 state decisions

3018991900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Parker, Ch. J.

¶1 Isaac F. Jones by his will authorized the executrix thereof, with the consent of her mother, to sell his real estate. Jones died in 1870, the mother of the executrix died in 1875, without having given her consent to a sale, and in 1896 the executrix attempted to exercise the power. The Appellate Division correctly decided that, at the time of the death of the mother, it was the law of this state that her death operated to terminate the power of sale. (Barber v. Cary, 11 N. Y. 397.)

¶2 The contention of the appellant that section 154 of the Real Property Law (L. 1896, ch. 547) establishes that it is now the law that, notwithstanding the death of the mother, the power of sale survived and was properly executed, is not well taken in this case, as the statute was not passed until long after her death, and there is nothing in its provisions suggesting that it was intended to have a retroactive affect.

¶3 The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

¶4 All concur.

¶5 Judgment affirmed.

/14/ehsmith/399 · .json · Public domain