Drexel v. Berney’s Empirical Analysis
14 F. 268 · 1882
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1914
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eliza Brown v. Frances Swann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Even if formerly the complainant might have been entitled to a discovery, now that the parties can be examined in the same case as other witnesses, at the instance of the adverse party, there is no necessity for such relief.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. McDonald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.