Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 F.1d 427 - The Montapedia

The Montapedia’s Empirical Analysis

14 F. 427 · 1882

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
February 1994
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1994

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

50188218901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Independently of the statute of 1872, the case is without any circumstances which would require or allow this court to entertain jurisdiction, (see the opinion rendered by this court In re The Carolina, in April, 1876, [D.C., 14 F.] ante 424,) and that statute does not include this cause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.