Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 4872.

Dysart v. Boynton

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1926.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1926-11-03

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1926-11-03

¶1Petition for mandamus.

¶2Suit in forma pauperis.

¶3John Carlton Dysart, of Amarillo, Tex., in pro. per.

¶4John D. Hartman, U. S. Atty., of San Antonio, Tex., for respondents.

¶5Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7It not. appearing that any proposed bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge during the term of the court at which petitioner was tried, or during the further time allowed by any order made in that regard, the petition for the writ of mandamus is denied.

/14/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain