Sutherland v. McInnes

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1926.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1926-08-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1954

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Brill v. McInnes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Joseph William Woodrough · Decided 1926-08-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Mexico; Colin Neblett, Judge.

¶2Tomlinson Fort, of Roswell, N. M. (Hiram M. Dow, of Roswell, N. M., on the brief), for appellant.

¶3R. D. Bowers, of Hagerstown, Md., for appellee.

¶4Before SANBORN, Circuit Judge, and WOODROUGH and SCOTT, District Judges.

¶5WOODROUGH, District Judge.

¶6The considerations which compel an affirmance in the ease of Nicholas Brill v. McInnes, Receiver (No. 7217) 14 F.(2d) 306, result in an affirmance in this ease; and it is so ordered.