Seif v. Nagle’s Empirical Analysis
14 F.2d 416 · 1926
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1993
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mahler v. Eby · Low Wah Suey v. Backus · United States Mensevich v. Tod · United States ex rel. Bauder v. Uhl · United States ex rel. Goldman v. Tod
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The objection that the alien was not permitted to examine the warrant of arrest, that the warrant was not read to him, and that the evidence upon which it was based was not shown to him, as required by rules 4 and 22, governing procedure by the Department of Labor, is not of vital importance, provided the alien had a fair hearing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex Parte Bridges““It is urged that the Secretary of Labor and Commissioner of Immigration have waived the right to deport in that they have waited an unreasonable time after the Department of Labor assumed jurisdiction •of the detained. We find no merit in the point.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.